The Supreme Court has stated that it cannot put on trial citizens of the Country for expressing anti-government views.
“Dissent is not sedition.”
Ready for a challenge? Click here to take our quiz and show off your knowledge!
This is what the Supreme Court said while quashing a a PIL against the former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Farooq Abdullah.
A plea filed by Rajat Sharma and others through advocate Shiv Sagar Tiwari against Farooq Abdullah for making statements against the scrapping of Article 370.
Moreover, the top court has also imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on the petitioners for filing the plea against Abdullah.
Ready for a challenge? Click here to take our quiz and show off your knowledge!
“The act of Abdullah is very serious against the interest of the nation therefore he deserves to be removed from the Parliament,” said the plea.
Also read: If there is no BJP, there may be no AIUDF: Assam Congress
A two-judge bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta heard the plea.
“Dissent cannot be termed seditious,” held the SC bench.
The petitioner pleaded before the Court to pass an order disqualifying Farooq Abdullah from the Parliament for making statements against the scrapping of Article 370.
The Court got enraged and said penal action should be taken against the petitioner for filing a “frivolous petition”.
Also read: Assam Assembly elections: BJP likely to finalise, release candidates list today