Guwahati: Manipur BJP spokesperson T. Michael Lamjathang Haokip has formally urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to honor the Manipur Assembly’s unanimous February 2024 resolution and not extend the controversial Suspension of Operations (SoO) agreement.
The controversial SoO agreement, involving Kuki, Zomi, and Hmar insurgent groups, faced its last extension deadline on February 29, 2024.
Ready for a challenge? Click here to take our quiz and show off your knowledge!
Under the tripartite SoO agreement, involving the two dozen insurgent groups, the Centre, and the state government, militants are bound by strict ground rules. These include prohibitions on recruiting new members and highway extortion, as well as requirements to remain in designated camps with their firearms secured in jointly monitored storages.
In his letter to PM Modi, Haokip stated the constitutional implications of ignoring the state assembly’s resolution. “As per the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, public order falls under the State List. On 29 February 2024, the current 12th Manipur Legislative Assembly, where the BJP holds the majority, unanimously resolved against any extension of the SoO agreement with UPF/KNO by the government of India,” he stated.
He further warned that “Ignoring this decision would not only violate the Constitution but also undermine the democratic mandate of the people of Manipur. I urge the government of India to honour this resolution and uphold the federal principles of our democracy.”
Ready for a challenge? Click here to take our quiz and show off your knowledge!
Lamjathang Haokip argued against treating the armed groups under the SoO agreement as “partners in peace.”
“Continuing to patronise insurgent groups in the hills of Manipur risks creating man-made, human-triggered volcanoes that will inevitably erupt. It is time to treat such groups for what they are: militants, not partners in peace,” Haokip stated in his letter.
Should an extension of the SoO agreement be deemed unavoidable, Haokip proposed that such a decision should only occur after the reinstatement of a popular government in Manipur.
He also stressed the necessity of a broad-based consultation with all affected stakeholders, including indigenous groups from both the hill and valley regions, with particular emphasis on leaders and community members of the Thadou tribe.
Haokip alleged that the government appears “unable to enforce the agreed ground rules, and [so] any further extension serves no meaningful purpose.”
He added, “Mere reduction of designated camps is not a solution; it only amounts to shifting responsibility without addressing the core problem.”
Notably, the two dozen Kuki, Zomi, and Hmar insurgent groups operate under two primary umbrella organizations: the Kuki National Organisation (KNO) and the United People’s Front (UPF), both of which are signatories to the SoO agreement.
Significantly, the Manipur Police confirmed in September 2024, for the first time, the involvement of insurgents part of the SoO agreement in the ethnic violence. They also confirmed the involvement of the Meitei insurgent group UNLF (P), which had signed a ceasefire agreement with the Centre and the state, in the ethnic violence.
Earlier this month, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) arrested a member of the Kuki National Army (KNA), a SoO signatory group, for attacking a police post and killing two commandos in Manipur’s border town Moreh in January 2024.