The Rights and Risks Analysis Group (RRAG) has asked the Central government to scrap the Sedition law.
Releasing its report, “Sedition: India’s Silencer Gun” RRAG stated that as per the National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB) data, the BJP-ruled states have dished out more sedition cases under Section 124A of the IPC since it started collecting data in 2014.
The practical implementation of Kedar Nath Singh judgment of 1962 has basically been put aside only for the judiciary to interpret while sedition charges have been rampantly invoked against opposition political leaders, journalists, activists, student leaders, celebrities, or even labourers who only exercised the right to freedom of speech and expression or advocated the right to assemble peacefully.
As per the NCRB, a total of 326 sedition cases were registered across the country from 2014 to 2019 and 559 persons were arrested.
Among the States, the highest number of sedition cases (54) was registered in Assam, followed by Jharkhand (40), Haryana (35), Karnataka (30), Bihar, Jammu & Kashmir and Kerala (25 each), and Uttar Pradesh (17).
Further, there has been a 98% increase in sedition cases from 2014 (47 cases) to 2019 (98 cases).
“The data collated by the NCRB does not appear to reflect the actual number of sedition cases filed in the country. For example, the NCRB data stated that only 19 sedition cases were filed in Jharkhand during 2017 (1 case) and 2018 (18 cases) while the Jharkhand Police had filed 30 FIRs/cases against about 200 named accused and more than 10,000 unnamed people involved in the Pathalgadi movement of 2017-18,” said Suhas Chakma, Director of the RRAG.
As per the NCRB, the rate of conviction for sedition offences from 2015 to 2019 was 8.92% i.e. in five out of 56 cases against the conviction rate for overall cognizable offences under IPC of 48.58% during the same period.
This confirms that many of the sedition cases filed are frivolous but the accused had to undergo a grueling process of trial with an offence which can be punished with up to imprisonment for life.
Apart from Chapter VI, Chapter VII and Chapter VIII of the Indian Penal Code dealing with public disorder and security of the State, since the Kedar Nath Singh judgment in 1962, the government of India has enacted the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act of 1967, the Contempt of Court Act of 1971, and the National Security Act of 1980 while a range of state-specific laws such as the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act of 1978 too have been enacted to deal with any attempt to overthrow the government, and threat to sovereignty and territorial integrity of India.
Section 124A of the IPC has put in jeopardy the right to freedom of opinion and expression itself because of the vagueness of the terms like “hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the government”, and the inability of the State to restrict its application only in cases which “incite people to violence against the Government established by law or create public disorder” as enunciated by the Supreme Court in Kedar Nath Singh judgment.
“Complaints of sedition are mostly filed by private individuals who claim as nationalists or members or affiliates of mostly the ruling parties whether at the Centre or State level, against their real or perceived opponents, whether political or ideological and dissenters in a democracy.
“The most serious crime against a State i.e. to overthrow the government or threaten its sovereignty and territorial integrity has been reduced to a matter of perception of a person’s own view on nationalism, a compliant police, and in some cases, a complicit judicial officer,” said Chakma.
He said that the vindictiveness of the State, the grudges of the offended nationalists, or motivated actions of political activists, who invoke sedition clause at the drop of a hat to silence the opponents and critics, cannot be regulated.
“The time has come for India to repeal Section 124A of the IPC relating to sedition,” Chakma added.