NHRC
File photo

The Rights and Risk Analysis Group (RRAG) on Wednesday urged the NHRC to protect the Afghan nationals, who have fled to India in the wake of the Taliban takeover of the country by granting them refugee status.

The rights group has lodged a complaint (Diary No.13708/IN/2021) with the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).

Ready for a challenge? Click here to take our quiz and show off your knowledge!

The Afghans, who fled to India in the wake of the Taliban takeover include Wahidullah Kaleemzai, MP from Wardak; Abdul Aziz Hakimi, MP from Parwan; MP Abdul Qadir Zazai; Senator Malem Lala Gul; Jamil Karzai, former MP and second cousin to former Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Shukria Esakhail, MP from Baghlan.

The other Afghans, who fled to India, include Mohamamd Khan, Senator; Abdul Hadi Arghandiwal, former finance minister; Mohammad Sharif Sharifi, brother of former Vice-President Younus Qanooni; Mariam Solaimankhail, MP and Qais Mowafaq, senior advisor to Afghanistan’s Upper House.

Also read: Rights group urges NHRC to order Tripura government to hand over Pindulal murder case to CBI

Ready for a challenge? Click here to take our quiz and show off your knowledge!

Taking cognizance of the very volatile situation in Afghanistan, on August 17, 2021 India introduced a new category of electronic visa called “e-Emergency X-Misc Visa” with an aim to fast-track visa applications from Afghans for entry into India.

“The grant of “e-Emergency X-Misc Visa” is highly inadequate to address the needs of the Afghans fleeing to India. Visa comes with an expiry date which can be denied at any time,” said Suhas Chakma, director of the RRAG in a statement.

“Visa by definition also excludes extension of any humanitarian assistance by the Government and any possibility to work or engage in activities necessary for survival.”

“The grant of emergency visa, therefore, does not take into account the needs of the Afghans who fled to India and the fact that they are not in a position to return to Afghanistan as the Taliban has taken over the entire country and refoulement means certain torture or even death,” Chakma added.

It would be a historic blunder if India fails to grant refugee status and protection to the Afghan nationals who have fled to India irrespective of their religion, he said.

“The Afghans who fled to India including the members of parliament had worked with the Government of India in the last 20 years, which makes them special targets of the Taliban, and therefore, India cannot abandon them by granting only e-visas,” Chakma further stated.

Having entered the territory of India, they have protections under Article 21 of the Constitution of India relating to the right to life.

Further, the Afghans require humanitarian assistance such as shelter, food, clothing, schooling for their kids, health and medical facilities and cash doles or opportunity to work or engage in activities for survival.

“The Government of India has been already extending similar humanitarian assistance to about 73,404 Tibetan refugees living in different states in India and 59,506 Sri Lankan refugees staying in 107 camps in Tamil Nadu and one camp in Odisha.

The Home Ministry in its Report 2019-2020 Annual Report stated that India had spent Rs. 40 crores on the Tibetan refugees from 2015-2016 to 2018-2019 and Rs.1021 crores on the upkeep of the Sri Lankan Tamil refugees in India as of December 2019.

“Therefore, there is no reason as to why India must not formulate a policy on the Afghan refugees,” he stated.

In its complaint, the RRAG urged the NHRC to set up a division within the NHRC to process the refugee claims of the Afghan refugees who have fled to India following the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan or who were in India but are unable or unwilling to return.

PRAG also urged the NHRC to issue direction to the Government of India to not repatriate any Afghan refugee without prior sanction of the NHRC, and direct the Government of India to formulate a policy on the Afghan refugees and provide all basic relief assistance as well as cash at par with the Tibetan and Sri Lankan refugees.