Aizawl: Mizoram chief minister Lalduhoma on Friday said that no irregularities were found in the civil service examinations conducted by the Mizoram Public Service Commission (MPSC) as per the inquiry report submitted recently.
The report of the inquiry conducted by former state chief secretary M. Lalmanzuala has come to the conclusion that there were ‘no irregularities’ and ‘no marks altered’ in the civil service exams as alleged by a student body, he said.
He said that the inquiry officer conducted an in-depth study and thorough investigation into the alleged irregularities in the conduct of competitive examinations for civil service, police service and other services by the MPSC last year.
“The inquiry officer submitted his detailed report last week. The finding of the inquiry is that there are no irregularities in the conduct of competitive examinations. The inquiry also found that marks obtained by candidates were not altered,” Lalduhoma told a news conference on Friday.
The inquiry also discovered that the marks which were indicated on answer sheets and later rubbed using correcting fluids have turned out exactly similar to those given on specific tabulation sheets when carefully examined, he said.
Earlier, Mizoram’s apex student body, Mizo Zirlai Pawl (MZP), launched an agitation at the MPSC office here demanding the resignation of the commission’s chairman JC Ramthanga over the alleged irregularities.
It also demanded a probe into the alleged irregularities.
The organisation alleged that irregularities took place in the conduct of a combined competitive examination held in October last year as marks obtained by some candidates were found altered on answer papers and tabulation sheets using correcting fluid.
It had also said that correcting fluid was hardly used in the past and when the evaluator wanted to correct the marks he or she had already given on answer papers, he or she would strike it off with a pen and would give the new marks by putting his or her signature or explanation remarks under the marks.
Following the agitation, the government ordered a probe and appointed Lalmanzuala, who is also former chairman of MPSC, as an inquiry officer on April 15.
He was asked to submit his report within seven days of his appointment.
Lalmanzuala submitted his report on April 24.
Normally, answer sheets undergo three-tier evaluation and evaluators are not allowed to give marks on answer sheets except on tabulation sheets, according to MPSC officials.
However, sometimes, evaluators tend to give marks on answer sheets, which are required to be erased or removed before passing on the answer sheets to the next evaluator, they said.
This is done to ensure independent evaluation, they said.
The marks given separately by the first and second evaluators on tabulation sheets are compared by the third evaluator or scrutinisers, who allot the final marks after making corrections if needed, officials said.
Subsequently, the final marks given by the scrutiniser are carefully examined by the MPSC office after which final tabulation is done, they added.